Articulation
1) My argument Write your argument in one sentence. Then, spend some time explaining it.I want to argue that the human brain is related to the ability of emphathy, so empathy is inherent. People usually regard empathy ability the sure, basic human ability, but it depends on brain developement. I want to argue that human can emphathy not by his or her own ability, but through complex neuran system.
2) How I found my argument Explain how your research helped you find your argument. Or, in other words, how did your research evolve into your argument? Start with your research question.
I decided "Why people differently assess other to when they assess themselves?" as my first research question. Then I became to wonder "Can human sympathy others completely?" As I researched about 'sympathy', I got to know the difference between 'sympathy' and 'empathy'. And I determinded to observe about empathy because it was more generally used to express 'the human ability understanding other's acts or minds' At first I thought that empathy is not related to neuran system in human brain. But as I researched, there were so many evidences which show the close relation between neuron system and the empathy ability. So, I think it would be good to persuade others that empathy is inherent ability.
3) New research questions What do you still need to know? What is your research plan?
a) Are there anything out of brain that affect the empathy?
b) How the brain can affect the empathy activity?
c) Do children or animals can also empathize others?
I will search some facts about human brain which are related to empathy ability on the internet. I need lots of fact that can prove brain is including empathy ability.
4) Connections to the Harvard Sampler
This argument has many connections to the Harvard Sampler. First, empathy ability is closely related to human mind. Also as in Harvard Sampler human mind was explained with human brain, I'm planning to explain empathy ability with some facts of human brain.
